This
post examines how socialization into a social class and economic class impact
the individual as they enter the professional workforce and the subsequent
upward or downward economic mobility.
It will attempt to show that the socialization process acts similar to
an ocean current carrying the individual in a general direction. However, it will also show that just as
a swimmer can swim against the current to arrive at his desired destination,
individuals exerting sufficient force against the influences of their
socialization can alter their destination.
Socialization
is the process by which the values, norms, and taboos of society are taught and
reinforced to members of a society.
Our socialization takes on many facets as we are socialized into our
peer group, family, school, and social class. Our social class refers to the stratification within society
separating societal members by their prestige, perceived power and social
standing.
Society’s
stratification into social classes is not a set of discreet, well defined social
groups, rather it is a gradient of social characteristics adapted by various
groups that are most noticeable when compared across distant groups along that
gradient. The socialization
process that inculcates the values and norms of where we are along that
gradient shapes our vision of who we are, our self-perceived potential, and the
opportunities we think are available to us. As we enter the work force, our occupational choice is
shaped by these social forces. As
a part of a cooperative effort between representatives of the disciplines of
sociology, psychology, and economics said the following about the effects of
this socialization while describing why a recent college graduate would not
pursue his ideal job for which he had trained and was qualified: “Occupational
choice is restricted by lack of knowledge about existing
opportunities...Variations in knowledge, in rationality, and in discrimination
between alternatives constitute, therefore, the limiting conditions within
which individuals choose occupations by arriving at a compromise between their
preferences and expectancies. This
compromise is continually modified up to the time of actual entry... (Blau et. al.,
535)”
An
example of the above can be illustrative.
The three sons of a widowed German immigrant are taught to work with
their hands all through their youth.
They are exposed to carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanics,
teamsters, etc. Upon entering the
work force, the oldest becomes a diesel mechanic and the youngest becomes a
truck driver—each working for an employer. None of the sons were taught to value education beyond high
school, so none achieved a college degree. The middle son suffered from emphysema throughout his life
and realized his inability to maintain a traditional job, so he decided to buy
his own trucks and start his own trucking firm. His socialization had included working hard but did not
include the concept of entrepreneurial spirit necessary to be successful as a
business owner. He excelled and
failed several times, was taken advantage of by a business partner but in the
end, before his death, became mildly successful with his trucking firm. His son however, having been socialized
within the home of an entrepreneur, took over the business left by his father
and expanded it into a $20 million annual enterprise.
In
the above example, the oldest and youngest sons each continued within the
framework of their socialization and were successful in their chosen
occupations. The middle son, due
to his ill health, was forced to depart from the socialization of his youth to
become an entrepreneur. Since his
breaking away from what he had been socialized to become was recognized as
being due to health so he faced no sanctions for his departure. However, in the film we concluded today
in class, there can be huge social pressures when one attempts to climb above
the social class or economic class one inherited from their parents. The sanctions of guilt and rejection
are common when attempting to move away from the social or economic class we
inherit.
The
shift away from the socialization of our youth can be accomplished but only by
exerting great personal effort which demands courage and stamina. So the real questionis why do we
sanction those attempting to improve themselves beyond their inherited status?
References
Blau,
Peter M., Gustad, John W., Jessor, Richard, Parnes, Herbert S., Wilcock, Richard
C. “Occupational Choice: A Conceptual Framework.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 9.4 (1956):
531-543
What is meant by "individuals exerting sufficient force against the influences of their socialization can alter their destination"? Remember the sociological perspective looks at overall patters rather than individual cases.
ReplyDelete